| |
[Jun. 19th, 2009|09:38 pm] |
| [ | mood |
| |  stressed | ] |
Well, I don't think anyone could have classed that as having gone well.
There were four questions, at ten marks each.
One of them I had no idea what the question was about (as in, I knew the name of it, and pretty much nothing else). I wrote something for it, but I'd be surprised if it garnered any marks at all.
One of them I was reasonably proud of the answer for, but my abysmal performance on the previously mentioned one means that I'm now paranoid that I didn't answer that one correctly.
The other two were sort of in the middle, I knew what the item was, but I'm not sure whether I actually answered the question in context (and he was big on IN CONTEXT, from what I recall).
I'm sort of hoping that between the three I actually answered with something relating to the question, there are enough marks to pass me so I don't have to do the subject again.
I think I'll go cry in the corner now.
-Mmaster |
|
|
| Comments: |
ah i felt the same way with my psychometrics exam (only it had 10 questions instead of 4). i ended up throwing some stuff on hoping for the best - and hoping the others had equally less time cramming so they'd rescale. | |
![[info]](http://piktures.deadjournal.com/userinfo.gif){kind=small}